Ranches of the West Inc. :: Build It and They Will Come

 There was this 350 acre or so dry land basin on a ranch of ours. Views were magnificent, and it tucked to the folds of the Tobacco Root foothills, majestic eleven and twelve thousand foot peaks framing the high desert scene. Two small creeks, seasonal and intermittent, flowed through the gentle swells of the basin. An old trapper’s cabin and remnants of his corral perched with an ageless gray and weathered tilt next to two huge cottonwoods, their limbs reaching for the sun, and their roots desperately searching for water in the summer dry cobble of the tiny creek bed.

The occasional antelope and mule deer wandered here, particularly in the winter. But the whitetail deer, lovers of water and cover, and the elk further up on the remaining 15,000 surface acres of the ranch disdained the dry hollow cradled in the foothills just above the valley.

It struck me that, as on numerous other ranches, changing the feed, introducing a reliable water supply, and creating a tad of cover that would expand as the other improvements took hold might just draw the more coveted elk, and stealthy whitetail.

We built a pond, fed by a ditch stretching two miles across the face of the mountains from a small perennial (year around) creek in which we owned all the water rights. Plans were made for that first pond of about an acre. This pond would then feed several others. We killed off the brome grass planted decades before, and replaced it with higher quality, protein intense forage including dry land alfalfa, wild Russian, and basin rye, with about 100 acres of crested wheat for spring feed.   A few fast growing, fast spreading stands of cottonwoods and aspens were carefully located. The cattle were removed.

That was three years ago. The basin is now home to a year round resident herd of about 40 elk. The cows of the bunch are calving just above the golden folds of the new seeding. The elk numbers, including some mighty fine looking big bulls, swell to several hundred from November to May, as seasonal conditions make the basin magically attractive as winter range. Whitetails are now abundant; in fact, they run helter-skelter, tails waiving back and forth in alarm as we approach. Many of them sport antlers that would make the most ardent of whitetail hunters proud. The antelope numbers have tripled, as have the Mule Deer.

A day after the machines left the new pond this year there were elk and deer tracks. Although this doesn’t always happen with such speed, I smiled with the instant gratification of it all.

Build it and they will come.

Photo by Reid L Rosenthal Copyright 2008

Read or make comments for this article

Tom, Thank you ...
Comment from: Reid (Guest)

Tom, Thank you for your comment.  I?m sorry I did not reply sooner, but the site has been undergoing updates, as you probably noticed.  Your post is the theme of several other folks here, too.  In reply I am going to ask you some rhetorical questions: 

1.  Do you believe cows or other livestock are native or non-native?

2.  Do you think that human activity on land, for instance, roads, homes, structures, fences, is ?natural? or ?unnatural??

3.  Do you believe that the storage of water resources in the upper portions of a basin augment and stabilize flow regimes in the lower part of the basin during the critical dryer times of year?

4.  Do you agree all living organisms need food, shelter, water?

5.  Do you believe the higher the quality/quantity of food, water and shelter, the healthier and more diverse all biological populations, and the greater the weight gain for livestock?

6.  Do you agree that improper human uses on land, including poorly managed livestock pasturage, damage the land and the resources (food, shelter, water)? 

Assuming you concur with at least some of the queries above, here is the final question:

If improving, repairing, and protecting resources restores the land from man?s previous indiscretions, results in a more efficient, profitable livestock operation, creates real estate (or simple enjoyment) value via wildlife, fisheries and aesthetics, and benefits the water resources of an entire basin, why would one not undertake the tasks?

 

Well, I still think ...
Comment from: tom (Guest)
Well, I still think that you are altering the landscape and the natural order of the land, and that affects the wildlife populations, flora and fauna. 
Thanks for stopping ...
Comment from: reid (Guest)
Thanks for stopping in, Jerry.  Glad you like the site. And this is just the beginning. Lots of new stuff will going up over the coming weeks and months. Fun, funny (some of it at least) and informative. Stay tuned! Info on the specific ranches will start appearing in the next few days!
Hey I like this new ...
Comment from: Jerry (Guest)
Hey I like this new site.  Lots of good stuff here.  When will the rest of the info on the different ranches be available?
Well Tucker, we will...
Comment from: Reid (Guest)
Well Tucker, we will have to agree to disagree (smile). I am a cowman too. I have found that done right, carefully thought out prior to implementation, these types of enhancements are not exclusive. In other words, with good proactive management and planning, what is good for cattle is good for wildlife ,and vice versa. In the end it all goes back to the Land, does it not? The creation and maintenance of sustainable resources means BOTH healthy game herds (themselves a valuable assist in 21st century ranching), AND better weight gain on the beef. Putting aside that elk were here long before cattle, and man, would you not agree that ranch roads, pasture drift fences, irrigated hay and crop lands and similar improvements are "alterations" of the system? And we both know critters will travel miles each day down from the ridges to green irrigated fields for night time snacking--a far greater distance than they will or have to travel for water, since one can always find small springs up on the hill. As for trespassing, not getting your place up to signature status hurts you, not them. There are far better ways (which I review humorously and thoroughly in my upcoming book) to deal with the "what's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine" crowd without suppressing value on your own spread.
I think by altering ...
Comment from: Tucker (Guest)
I think by altering the landscape you do more damage than good. You bring the large game down further for water, they are healthier therefore reproduce more, they trample more ranchland and leave less for the cattle. Not to mention now that land attracts more hunters and trespassers.
Hi Cassandra. The pi...
Comment from: Reid (Guest)
Hi Cassandra. The picture here is actually a pond which is just going on two years old. The key to knowing one has done a good job on this type of undertaking, is how quickly it looks natural--as if it had nestled there in the folds of the draw for a hundred years. Long Knife One, we call it. With scores of these types of resource projects going every year on a myriad of ranches, I finally figured out an uncomplicated identification system, with the lowest upland water improvement in a drainage being numbered "one". The old keep it simple stupid theory at work!
Is this a new pond o...
Comment from: Cassandra (Guest)
Is this a new pond or one of the ones you built last year?
Rick, thanks for the...
Comment from: Reid (Guest)
Rick, thanks for the comments, and they are good ones. However, the fact is that building and maintining superior habitat holds game herds in one place longer, OFF the neighbors. Creating and maintaining improved natural resources add pounds to cows (and we sell pounds, not animals) and sanctuary for wildlife. It does not materially increase wildlife populations, simply makes the existing population healthier. For a 21st century ranch to work, one must look at all revenue streams. The days of making it simply with cows are done. Real estate, tax, wildlife, fishery, and other revenue streams are an integral part of truly viable economic land model. And, the net result is better resources , which I believe do benefit the neighbors, particularly downstream neighbors enjoying increased stream flows and water quality, not to mention more constant release in late summer months due to upstream storage.  Altering the eco system, and repairing degradation from drought, over grazing, poor forage rotation, undeveloped water resources, previous mismangement, or lack of creative resource maximization are two different matters. You sound like a land owner. Don\'t you think that every fence, road, building, cultivated field, irriagted acre on your place is an alteration from natural state? I believe we have the responsibility to repair what is wrong due to man\'s previous tampering, enhance what we can to make the resource signature quality, preserve as much of that as reasonably economic in perpetuity, and minimize alterations, like the ones described above, as much as possible except in certain cases which are stand alone anamolies.  Finally, fence is fence. Whether raising horses in kentucky, buffalo on the plains, llamas in new england, or cows in the rockies (or elsewhere) domestic animals beat up fence, game beats up fence, trees fall on fences, streams wash out fences, and trespassers cut fences. I think a fence\'s mission in its existence is to be destroyed and repaired. Just ask my son, I think he has about 45 miles of fencing under his belt those last three years of high school (smile). Again thanks for chiming in!
I don't agree with y...
Comment from: Rick (Guest)
I don't agree with you. I think if you alter the landscape you therefore alter the entire ecosystem and suddenly you have altered the natural course of everything in the area. What about surrounding ranches that don't do resource improvement? Now these herds are foraging on their land also and possibly devastating what little they have to support their own herds. The elk and deer destroy the fencing and trample crops.
Good question, Marla...
Comment from: Reid (Guest)
Good question, Marla. However this is not alteration, it is enhancement. Water is not created, it is simply made more usable beneficially affecting numerous other resources in the ecosystem, including, as just a few examples, wildlife, basin hydrology (water storage up basin assists the lower basin in the dry times of late sumer and fall) fisheries, waterfowl, livestock, and when used for irrigation, crop, and related animal forage.</p> <p>Likewise, living organisms seek the most conducive environment. While improvements like these may shift an elk herd from one canyon to another, it does not increase population, population being a factor of many other catalysts or controls. In fact, there is good argument and research that the net result is a healthier population, as overall forage is increased. An acre of land, without improvement, will support only so many pounds of living organisms, the limitations being pounds of forage, and forage quality (protein content, etc.). Assuming a relatively stable population, the more forage, the better for each population unit. The converse is also true. Finally, no, these types of enhancements do not make game easier to hunt. Ungulates are wily creatures, holding virtually every advantage in true fair chase hunting. There is a reason average hunter success is only 11% per year in many elk harvest units. Obviously, the more critters in the field, the higher the chances for harvest, and the longer they remain in an area without migration, the greater the number of days within season that they can be pursued. But, elk, particularly are not partial to disturbance. Just one or two elementary mistakes and they will have a new zip code for the rest of the season, regardless of how enticing the food, shelter, water attributes of a particular piece of land.
It doesn't bother yo...
Comment from: Marla (Guest)
It doesn't bother you that you are altering the natural landscape to bring in big game? Doesn't that alter the entire ecosystem of the area? And doesn't that make the hunting easier to come by altering the natural lifespan and genetic code of herds?
Post a new comment to this article

Your nickname

Empty field not allowed

Please write the numbers you see in the image
Comments are held for approval by the Admin
Pages: 1 - 12 comments